Hirst

On the subject that Damien Hirst believes that art is more or slight topics, and who ever has the idea is the artist non the actual soulfulness creditworthy for the make of the wear round I am on the fence close to this one. On one ease up I completly dis checker with him because I think that the true implication of a persons art has to be applied by that individual, such as in a painting or a sculpture. On the other hand i do agree with him because of arcitechture. Arcitecture has to flip mutiple people with certian skills to be considered a master turn. The Eiffel jerk in Paris comes to mind when i think about multiple people constucting a homo of art. The Eiffel Tower was intentional by Alexandre Gustave Eiffel alone it took over ccc workers to assemble. The average person could make an interesting piece with a 50 million dollar bud let. Now the art that is produced may not be the greatest but it could be interesting.

I think that on that point is an artist inside all of us, but most never use it to the full extent. I do believe that Hirsts piece is art, just as taxidermy is art. In taxidermy it takes skill to make it have a realistic look to it. This piece has the realistic modal value because it uses a real shark that is not stuffed. This piece does actuate me of a speciem in a stir though. The bold lines of the tank make it like it is swimming foreign of a window. The shapes and pretension are very natural on the shark.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essa! y, visit our page: write my paper