Bioethics and Artificial Insemination :: Pregnancy Technology Science Essays

Bio moral philosophy and Artificial InseminationWith both revolutionary applied science that is born(p), there must be whiley questions as to whether this engine room is right or harmful as well as analyze who is affects. This peculiarly holds true(a) in dealing with the technology of imitation insemination. With the cultural mainstreaming of bathetic insemination, there develop been many expressions written discussing the ethics of such decisions. to the highest degree of these articles are written by feminist authors with the end of discussing the collision of this new technology on women and how it affects their aims as mothers in society. Daniel Callahan, however, chooses to accept his bank line just about the bioethics of artificial insemination through a male persuasion in his 1992 article Bioethics and Fatherhood. He argues that since the beginning of artificial insemination, there has been a trend to dribble the male and his anonymous donation of sperm atozoon. His writing expression is fairly well-to-do to read and rattling straightforward in an enterprise to convey his extremum to the general population. His opinion is obvious through his very one-sided line as well as occasional sarcastic remarks. For this, he does not base many of his points on factual depict however more(prenominal) abstract, logically deduced theory. His argument is that this man, the sperm donor, is biologically liable for the newly born child and its life thereafter. He bases his argument round the responsibility of the individual, the technology that allows men to be overlooked, and the rights movement that has lessened the responsibility of the man in fatherhood.Callahan begins his argument with the discussion of what it means to be a father biologically and clean-livingly. He relates these two terms by saying, human being beings bear a moral responsibility for those conscious acts that have an impact on the lives of others they are morall y accountable for those acts (Callahan, 99). Callahan feels that voluntary sexual activity, and by extension voluntary sperm donation, falls under this category. This logic holds true to the entire argument and strengthens his case against the minimization of the fathers role in parenthood. It is found on the very concrete fact that if the man did not build his sperm, the child would not exist. This is a very simple, but very unfluctuating argument. Callahan then furthers his case on the morality of sperm donation by saying that even if the child grows up in protect care, if that foster father were to be unfit, the biological father would have a moral obligation for the child.Bioethics and Artificial Insemination Pregnancy Technology Science EssaysBioethics and Artificial InseminationWith every new technology that is born, there must be many questions as to whether this technology is beneficial or harmful as well as analyze who is affects. This especially holds true in dealin g with the technology of artificial insemination. With the cultural mainstreaming of artificial insemination, there have been many articles written discussing the ethics of such decisions. Most of these articles are written by feminist authors with the purpose of discussing the impact of this new technology on women and how it affects their roles as mothers in society. Daniel Callahan, however, chooses to convey his argument about the bioethics of artificial insemination through a male perspective in his 1992 article Bioethics and Fatherhood. He argues that since the beginning of artificial insemination, there has been a trend to overlook the male and his anonymous donation of sperm. His writing style is fairly easy to read and very straightforward in an attempt to convey his point to the general population. His opinion is obvious through his very one-sided argument as well as occasional sarcastic remarks. For this, he does not base many of his points on factual evidence but more ab stract, logically deduced theory. His argument is that this man, the sperm donor, is biologically responsible for the newly born child and its life thereafter. He bases his argument around the responsibility of the individual, the technology that allows men to be overlooked, and the rights movement that has lessened the responsibility of the man in fatherhood.Callahan begins his argument with the discussion of what it means to be a father biologically and morally. He relates these two terms by saying, Human beings bear a moral responsibility for those voluntary acts that have an impact on the lives of others they are morally accountable for those acts (Callahan, 99). Callahan feels that voluntary sexual activity, and by extension voluntary sperm donation, falls under this category. This logic holds true to the entire argument and strengthens his case against the minimization of the fathers role in parenthood. It is based on the very concrete fact that if the man did not give his spe rm, the child would not exist. This is a very simple, but very strong argument. Callahan then furthers his case on the morality of sperm donation by saying that even if the child grows up in foster care, if that foster father were to be unfit, the biological father would have a moral obligation for the child.