The Truth About Physics And Religion :: essays research papers

The Truth About Physics and Religion umteen people call back that physical science and devotion ar separate entities.They make that physics deals precisely with the objective, material demesne, while trust deals only with the world of values. It is obvious, from these, andfrom legion(predicate) other comparisons, that conflicts have arisen between physics and piety. some ar convinced that the two fields completely oppose each other,and are not related in any ways. Many people, who follow a particular trust,feel offended by the admits that physicists have made, while physicists believethat religion has no nucleotide in reality. I will show, however, that theseconflicts are founded on a misunderstanding, and that there is no divisionbetween physics and religion. I will also prove that the misunderstanding liesin the parables of religion and in the statements made by physicists.Furthermore, I will show that only physicists can really know the truth ofphysics, and only rel igious chase can know the truth of that religioneveryone else has to take it on faith.Many people believe that physics and religion are entirely separate.They claim that physics is only concerned with discovering what is true or dishonest,while religion is concerned with what is good or evil. Scientists appear toagree that physics is the room in which we argue about the objective side ofreality. Religious followers, on the other hand, agree that religion is theway we express the subjective decisions that overhaul us choose the standards bywhich we live. Although these definitions seem to be contrasting, an important atom remains absent, an element that must first be considered before religionand physics can be compared.Those who think that religion has no basis in reality also believe thatthere is an obvious interval between the two fields. They think thatreligion is a jumble of false assertions, with no basis in reality. Paul Dirac,a physicist, once verbalizeThe very idea of God is a product of the humanimagination. It is quite understandable why primitivepeople, who were so much more clear to theoverpowering forces of nature than we are today,should have personified these forces in fear andtrembling. and nowadays, when we understand somany natural processes, we have no film for suchsolutions.Dirac, and those who think the same way, however, fails to consider theessential element that has caused many to misunderstand the relationship betweenphysics and religion. What they fail to realize is that religion uses lyric poemin quite a different way from science. The phraseology of religion is more closelyrelated to the language of poetry than to the language of science.